Page Summary
mizkit.livejournal.com - (no subject)
lil-brown-bat.livejournal.com - (no subject)
feste-sylvain.livejournal.com - She's Still Working
hanseth.livejournal.com - (no subject)
firni.livejournal.com - (no subject)
lil-brown-bat.livejournal.com - Re: She's Still Working
feste-sylvain.livejournal.com - Re: She's Still Working
lil-brown-bat.livejournal.com - Re: She's Still Working
feste-sylvain.livejournal.com - Re: She's Still Working
lil-brown-bat.livejournal.com - Re: She's Still Working
rmd.livejournal.com - Re: She's Still Working
Active Entries
Style Credit
- Base style: Line Up by
- Theme: Full Sky by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2008-08-27 08:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-27 08:47 pm (UTC)Goddammitall anyway.
She's Still Working
Date: 2008-08-27 09:05 pm (UTC)She continues to establish precedent, even in death.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-27 11:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-27 11:47 pm (UTC)Rubbing my eyes did nothing but induce pain.
Re: She's Still Working
Date: 2008-08-28 12:01 pm (UTC)Re: She's Still Working
Date: 2008-08-28 12:06 pm (UTC)This "test" should be perfectly routine, as "married is married".
But the very fact of its routineness is another nail in the argument that "marriage can only be between a man and a woman". The state's role in marriage is limited, but this is one of the roles.
And just today, the polls in California are showing weak support for the "rescind gay marriage" ballot question; it's losing now, and should only lose support between now and November.
The more normal same-sex marriages are, the more routine, the less support there is for banning them.
Re: She's Still Working
Date: 2008-08-28 12:21 pm (UTC)Actually, no, there shouldn't be any "test", as why would there be? The law is clear about degrees of relationship and how they inherit if someone dies intestate, so why would there be any "test"? AFAIK there hasn't been in MA.
The more normal same-sex marriages are, the more routine, the less support there is for banning them.
Yes, we figured that one out in MA too. The sky has not fallen yet. Although, truth to tell, it wasn't the "routine" that won the battle.
Re: She's Still Working
Date: 2008-08-28 12:26 pm (UTC)All I mean is that, in California, there wasn't yet a precedent. Now there is (or will be; estate settlements take time even without anyone contesting).
"Routine" doesn't win the battle, but it shores up the walls for the next assault. According to Maureen Reddington-Wilde, that's what kept Romney from ramming anything thru the MA legislature; as time went on, the attitude shifted from "Save Marriage!!!1!" to "why are you trying to break up these nice peoples' marriage?".
And that why the bigots desperately wanted the judges to hold off on allowing same-sex marriage "until the people vote". People are much more willing to vote for a wrong-headed theory than to hurt actual people.
Re: She's Still Working
Date: 2008-08-28 12:46 pm (UTC)Re: She's Still Working
Date: 2008-08-28 01:02 pm (UTC)