Page Summary
penk.livejournal.com - (no subject)
srakkt.livejournal.com - (no subject)
miss-bowtruckle.livejournal.com - (no subject)
rmd.livejournal.com - (no subject)
frobzwiththingz.livejournal.com - (no subject)
smeehrrr.livejournal.com - (no subject)
smeehrrr.livejournal.com - (no subject)
lionsburg.livejournal.com - (no subject)
rmd.livejournal.com - (no subject)
lionsburg.livejournal.com - (no subject)
miss-bowtruckle.livejournal.com - (no subject)
cz_unit - (no subject)
Active Entries
Style Credit
- Base style: Line Up by
- Theme: Full Sky by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2009-05-07 03:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-07 03:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-07 04:13 pm (UTC)But if you're happy, I'm happy!!
no subject
Date: 2009-05-07 04:22 pm (UTC)so in exchange for a couple of minutes' delay on legitimate mail from a new sender/source, it avoids thousands of spam messages per day without even having to process them on the machine.
no subject
Date: 2009-05-07 04:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-07 05:11 pm (UTC)If they start trying a second time regularly, I'll just up the number of retries required. Short of requiring a sending mail server to perform some processing on my behalf, I can't think of a more effective spam deterrent than greylisting.
no subject
Date: 2009-05-07 05:11 pm (UTC)Occasionally, however, I run into some busted-ass mail server that doesn't retry properly, and then I get bounces. One of those busted-ass mail servers is the one that my in-laws use. Sigh.
no subject
Date: 2009-05-07 07:52 pm (UTC)You go grrl! Smack those naughty emails!
no subject
Date: 2009-05-07 07:55 pm (UTC)RAAR! IN YOUR FACE, SPAMMERS.
no subject
Date: 2009-05-07 08:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-08 01:54 pm (UTC)Like, probably 20 a day. Ugh.
*makes a note to check with her*
:D
no subject
Date: 2009-05-10 05:25 am (UTC)CZ