The problem with that is that you end up with clerical errors. Pennsylvania overhauled their criminal code in, I think, the mid 1970s, and struck a bunch of the morals laws off the books, including those against opposite-sex unmarried individuals living together, sodomy, fornication, and so forth. Trouble was, when they got all the sex laws off the books, they accidentally legalized rape. Ooops. A few rapists walked during the eight months when rape was legal before somebody noticed. :-(
That's what happens when they try to keep too many laws on the books, I would say. In the area of rape, Pennsylvania was thorough screwed up regardless.
They should have undertaken a complete rewrite that took out the bit about spousal rape being impossible (http://www.ncvc.org/ncvc/main.aspx?dbName=DocumentViewer&DocumentID=32701) (which wasn't removed until 1995 in PA), instead.
no subject
Date: 2006-05-18 04:09 am (UTC)If it's so goddamned important, they can pass it again from time to time. If it's not, it shouldn't be on the books.
no subject
Date: 2006-05-18 04:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-18 07:43 am (UTC)They should have undertaken a complete rewrite that took out the bit about spousal rape being impossible (http://www.ncvc.org/ncvc/main.aspx?dbName=DocumentViewer&DocumentID=32701) (which wasn't removed until 1995 in PA), instead.
no subject
Date: 2006-05-18 12:27 pm (UTC)Couldn't they at least be charged with assault and battery?