rmd: (flip off kittens)
[personal profile] rmd
HEY, RCN, IS IT SO GODDAMNED DIFFICULT FOR YOU TO KEEP A GODDAMNED TCP SESSION OPEN FOR EVEN JUST FIVE WHOLE FUCKING MINUTES WITHOUT A RESET? HUH? DO YOU *WANT* ME TO DRIVE OVER THERE AND START FEEDING PEOPLE FEET-FIRST INTO A FUCKING WOODCHIPPER? HUH? IT'S *NOT* *THAT* *DIFFICULT*, PEOPLE. PACKETS GO IN. PACKETS GO OUT. DO NOT DROP THEM ON THE FUCKING FLOOR.

HERE'S A PICTURE OF WHY I HATE RCN

Date: 2010-08-12 04:38 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kathrynt.livejournal.com
. . . wow. That was INSPIRED.

I think I'm a little turned on.

Date: 2010-08-12 05:37 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] also-huey.livejournal.com
Don't sugarcoat it; tell us how you REALLY feel.

Date: 2010-08-12 05:44 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] r-ness.livejournal.com
I see you haven't lost any of your "ripping network providers a new one" fu.

Best of luck.

Date: 2010-08-12 06:52 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bikergeek.livejournal.com
They're probably throwing bogus TCP RESETs in hopes of thwarting P2P file sharing. For which they deserve to be ripped a new one. And damn, you are so very good at it.

Date: 2010-08-12 12:24 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rmd.livejournal.com
Maybe, but I don't think that's the issue. I'm seeing packet loss for straight-up ICMP. When the packets go thru, it's good performance and low latency. It's just the packets keep not going thru.

Date: 2010-08-12 11:18 am (UTC)
muffyjo: ! (!)
From: [personal profile] muffyjo
Go get em!

Date: 2010-08-12 03:42 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dfjdejulio.livejournal.com
What's an RCN?

Date: 2010-08-12 04:00 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rmd.livejournal.com
My cable internet provider.

Hunh

Date: 2010-08-12 05:20 pm (UTC)
drwex: (Default)
From: [personal profile] drwex
I've had some problems with net dropping on our home RCN connection but so far as traceroute can tell it wasn't local - it was their switching center in NYC that was horked.

What were you trying to do that they kept dropping the ball on/

Re: Hunh

Date: 2010-08-12 05:49 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rmd.livejournal.com
at various points, ssh, http, and team fortress 2.

Re: Hunh

Date: 2010-08-12 06:39 pm (UTC)
drwex: (Default)
From: [personal profile] drwex
what tool did you use to generate that visualization?

Re: Hunh

Date: 2010-08-12 06:43 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rmd.livejournal.com
pingplotter. it's a windows program i like.

Date: 2010-08-18 02:27 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] achinhibitor.livejournal.com
I'm sure it's cheaper to provision the network for 70% of the peak load than for 100% of the peak load. (30% packet loss, ugh!)

Date: 2010-08-18 05:52 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rmd.livejournal.com
if that's what's going on, i'd be fine. this is not the behavior of a correctly-functioning network that is engineered for 70% nominal load.

Profile

rmd: (Default)
rmd

June 2025

S M T W T F S
1234567
89 1011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Feb. 12th, 2026 07:23 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios